{"id":924,"date":"2019-09-05T20:09:04","date_gmt":"2019-09-05T20:09:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/?p=924"},"modified":"2019-09-13T19:03:27","modified_gmt":"2019-09-13T19:03:27","slug":"are-visual-learners-disadvantaged-in-classrooms-more-on-learning-style-myths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/2019\/09\/05\/are-visual-learners-disadvantaged-in-classrooms-more-on-learning-style-myths\/","title":{"rendered":"Are Visual Learners Disadvantaged in Classrooms? More on Learning Style Myths"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/file-19.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-925 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/file-19-300x298.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"298\" srcset=\"https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/file-19-300x298.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/file-19-150x150.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/file-19-768x763.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/file-19-1024x1017.jpeg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>&#8220;I am a very visual learner so I do not learn well in classes with a lot of lecture.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>After having taught for over 25 years I hear variations of that comment a lot. In conversations with students I have heard a range of complaints. Teachers who only use one teaching style. Teachers who do not provide &#8216;hands on&#8217; learning opportunities. Teachers who talk a lot who do not show pictures, diagrams, and figures. \u00a0With the start of schools around America this month, many students are wondering what their teachers will be like? \u00a0Will teachers&#8217; styles fit preferred learning styles? Does it matter?<\/p>\n<p>Apparently, if you ask the majority of K-12 teachers, the answer is a resounding YES. \u00a0Does the research bear this out? \u00a0A resounding NO.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the bottom line: <strong>While we all may have\u00a0<em>preferences<\/em>\u00a0for how we like to experience new material and interact with it (aka learn), we do\u00a0<em>not\u00a0<\/em>have to be\u00a0<em>taught\u00a0<\/em>in a style that matches those preferences.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>While it may seem like commonsense to assume that we learn better when taught in a style that matches our preferences, there is no scientific evidence to back this up. \u00a0Yet, this belief if widely held. In a recent study, Ulrich Boser of the\u00a0<a class=\"ext\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-learning-agency.com\/insights\/what-do-teachers-know-about-the-science-of-learning\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Learning Agency<\/a>, sent out a survey to 515 educators using Amazon&#8217;s Mechanical Turk service. \u00a0A little under half responded to a brief survey of beliefs about educational practices. \u00a0The results were shocking to any academic informed about learning science.<\/p>\n<p>A whopping number of educators endorsed educational myths. For example,\u00a077% of the educators believed we are left-brained or right-brained [REALITY: while our brain is specialized for different functioning the &#8220;You are so right-brained&#8221; has NO scientific basis]. \u00a0 The biggest offender? \u00a0 Nearly ALL\u00a0the educators -97%, endorsed catering to \u00a0students learning styles to guide design of instruction!<\/p>\n<p>Researchers in cognitive and educational science have repeatedly tried to knock this idea down but it persists. A large part of the reason may be because we all have preferences for how we like to learn. We mistakenly believe these preferences are important. \u00a0I first noted this over 11 years ago. Claudia Rinaldi and I\u00a0assessed the learning styles preference of forty-five students and divided them into groups based on their learning preference. Each group then completed 4 assignments each highlighting one of four learning preferences (auditory, visual, tactile, and kinesthetic). <a href=\"https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/chairs-class-classroom-1708912.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-928 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/chairs-class-classroom-1708912-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/chairs-class-classroom-1708912-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/chairs-class-classroom-1708912-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs.dir\/1441\/files\/2019\/09\/chairs-class-classroom-1708912-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>Group scores on each assignment showed that designing assignments to match students&#8217; learning styles does not lead to better performance but active learning positively relates to overall learning. Scores on the auditory and tactile assignments were significantly different, but not in the hypothesized direction (i.e., auditory learners did not perform best on the auditory assignment). Nonetheless, students preferred assignments that matched their particular learning styles (<a class=\"ext\" href=\"http:\/\/www.uwosh.edu\/programs\/teachingforum\/public_html\/?module=displaystory&amp;story_id=648&amp;format=html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Rinaldi &amp; Gurung, 2008)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Of course that is one study with a small sample size you say. Indeed. \u00a0Here is what really convinces me to not worry about meshing teaching style with learning. \u00a0Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer, and Bjork conducted a significant review of the research and found NO EVIDENCE that learning styles and teaching styles meshing was important (<a class=\"ext\" href=\"https:\/\/pdfs.semanticscholar.org\/6275\/2ca4c446ca7328f8c284f5385f1af1c4212e.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Read it here<\/a>). This major 2009 publication has been supported and replicated many times over the last ten years. Yet, the results of Boser (2019) released this week show beliefs persist.<\/p>\n<p>So if you hear a student complain, be armed with this knowledge: Learning is improved when teachers use a variety of styles and in fact, being taught in a style different from your preference may even help you learn more!!<\/p>\n<p>This is one of the most pervasive myths about learning. Even in higher education we are surrounded by many buzzwords to foster instruction. We need to be cognizant of the research testing efficacy and effectiveness of practices before we launch into them. Not sure what&#8217;s been tested? \u00a0That&#8217;s where your local Center for Teaching and Learning can come in handy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;I am a very visual learner so I do not learn well in classes with a lot of lecture.&#8221; After having taught for over 25 years I hear variations of that comment a lot. In conversations with students I have &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/2019\/09\/05\/are-visual-learners-disadvantaged-in-classrooms-more-on-learning-style-myths\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9829,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[523],"class_list":["post-924","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-research"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3tIXF-eU","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9829"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=924"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":934,"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions\/934"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.blogs.oregonstate.edu\/osuteaching\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}